Thanks Veterans Today for the accuracy of your reporting.
The basic premise of Veterans Today(VT) is anti-Zionist approach that attempts to paint Israel as the leading cause of all world problems.VT borders on anti-Semitism even though the Senior Editor Gordon Duff claim Jewish ancestry.
This is little if any references to he information published but there are a great deal of innuendos, assumptions and accusations, all designed to fuel the minds of left wing conspiracy theorists.
As was already stated above if anyone dares to disagree with the established opinions, the comments are not published. Everything has to be pointing into a direction set by the editorial staff.In a private disagreement with Mr. Duff, he stated that it was nothing but the freedom of the press to disregard certain ideas that fail to meet their agenda.
Mr. Duff even went so far as to insinuate that he would have the survivors of the USS Liberty take care of me.If one will notice Mr. Duff states that he is a 100% disabled vet and has PTSD yet he claims to be a constant world wide traveler meeting with the highest circles of intelligence and political figures.He claims to work closely with the US government and US business interests but what entity would place faith and trust in a mental patient. PTSD is a psychological disorder and I don't mean to belittle any person who legitimately suffers from that disorder.
Many of the commentors are regulars that have learned a few key words of hate and mal content and attempt to paint negative images f almost anybody. Why I have been listed as a crook and nobody knows me other than disagreeing with the fruit basket cases.If what yuo are looking for it hate, discontent, lies, half truths amd black propaganda, then VT is for you.To each their own.
This website has nothing to do with its name. It is not about veterans - it is about very dirty anti-Jewish propaganda and conspiracy theories.
They do not try to argue with you - they just delete your comments leaving no trace. Their policy is to spam the web with extremely inaccurate propagandistic "news" - so that people will believe "if so many are talking about this, this is true". Vast majority of their articles do not stand against minimal criticism, and they do not really try to argue with opponents, they just spam you with more links and promote their websites.
Look who's talking.
Majority of articles in the "Israel" section are by Debbie Menon - Dubai based Palestine propagandist. Excerpt from her "about me" page (http://mycatbirdseat.com/about-4/):
----------
For those of my detractors that think I'm being selective and even "one sided," tough, that is the point of my work
----------
So this author, dominant on the VeteransToday website, does not share the values of unbiased information, on the contrary, she believes in one sidedness and manipulation.
Alan Sabrosky, a Director of the website, is an active writer for the "Intifada Palestine" website (as well as above mentioned Debbie Menon). See them here:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/contact/staff-writers/
http://www.intifada-palestine.com/about-us/
See what real veterans think about this website:
"... Veterans Today engages in lazy journalism, fails to verify anything, alters the timeline, and then uses that to bash Veterans Service Organizations... "
Taken from: http://burnpit.legion.org/2010/04/veterans-today-inaccuracies-and-slander-against-veterans-service-organizations/
Bottom-line: this website is created to deliberately damage image of American Army Veterans.
Answer: Like any verification, do an internet search for it. If it is not found, someone may have made it up. If it is found and it is either confirmed or dismissed, you may know the answer. For any of such verifications in general, keep in mind that it includes a "subject" in which people are for or against (like politics), the answer may not be clear. On one hand who is for will try to hide the truth, on the other hand, who is against will try to throw dirt. My suggestion when in that kind of situation is to keep an open mind for both scenarios and understand who is for/against.
Answer: A typical wRONg Paul supporter embraces VeteransToday.com, how typical...