Stories are half baked easily debunked sad excuses for literature. They have little evidence and should not be looked to for any source of information.
These bloggers do nothing but "write" about speculations and theories. Most of the time they are completely wrong. What drives these people to blog such absurdities? It's just full of garbage.
Not much serious reporting going on here, they appear *******@FilmClickbate on a regular basis which says a lot. There youtube stuff can be okay at times, but mostly just filler.
Thanks for the feedback Dean. We've definitely been trying to dial-back the way our articles were presented on social. To be fair, we appear less frequently on@filmclickbait than we used to!
Non factual and bulls*it. Also adwall every chance they get. They're an internet company bent on spreading misinformation and clickbait stories.
A bunch of losers who - failed in life, criticise others peoples movies. They aren't funny and they are pathetic.
Screen Rant is always up to date with their reality tv news and provides an interesting angle on topics. I'll always use their website for entertainment news!
This site is some of the laziest, most opinionated and biased clickbait around. It's like someone paid the Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons to write badly written hateful articles on everything. Expect to read gems like "DC MOVIES ARE BAD BECUZ THEY'RE DARK - DERP" and "FANS HAVE FORGIVEN GEORGE LUCAS".
Just absolute gutter level YouTube-like commentary dressed up as journalism. Avoid.
Hello Peter, I'm surprised by the two articles you highlight here. In general, our team is pretty supportive of the DCEU and the darker tone. We were one of the only sites reporting on the Snyder Cut - and, if you listen to our most recent podcast, are all eager to see the Snyderverse continue. I'm also unsure why writing an article highlighting how some fans have grown to appreciate George Lucas more (after beating him up for a decade after the prequels) in recent years would be considered hateful.
Pretty much what everyone else is saying. I look at mostly the DC Marvel stuff. The biggest thing that gets me a lot is the the dissing of Superman. 15 reasons this character is better than Superman, Superman can't beat these 10 villains, how you gonna list certain villains when Superman hasn't fought them?! But my biggest peeve was the belony they pulled with Man of Steel Superman and CW's Supergirl saying she's superior for really bogus bullspit reasons. Just uugh wtf are you people on?
Hi Dominic, sorry to hear you're upset about our Superman content. Superman is my personal favorite superhero and I loved Man of Steel. No one article on the site is site "canon". We allow writers with different perspectives to share their take - some are better than others but we're not dissing Superman on the whole. If anything, we've been some of the biggest supporters of releasing the Snyder Cut (and did loads of exclusive reporting on that prior to its confirmation) largely because we are massive fans of the Big Blue Boy Scout.
Screen rant is a fun place for people to learn about cool easter eggs, however SPOILER ALERT! Watch the movie first. Even better watch ALL the movies, easter eggs may be fun cool connections about movies but they have another name, spoilers!
The things on there are %90 wrong, there is no way to comment either. If i hadnt watched come of the shows myself, i would've been terribly misdirected to believe this site's BS
All this site is is a gossip rag along with the likes of The Sun and The Enquirer. Trying to stir up trouble where there is nine. Don't believe a word of what you read.
They have fake news. Their opinions, which I know are different and you can't change them, are really bad and their articles are horrific with almost no editing.
The sites decent but most of there articles are blatant clickbait just to get clicks and alot of the time there information is inaccurate especially there anime related things like most of there naruto articles are blatantly false like in one they claim choji can beat naruto and shikamaru also crippled gai could beat naruto they even clarified they meant boruto era him
Too many rumor thats not true, and many articles are hate speech. This site also show disrespect to official and director film. Please, search other news site. This one is unreliable and full of fake
Inaccurate and click-baity. Screenrant are clearly more interested in $#*!ting out new articles and content quickly than they are about the quality and accuracy of it.
Hi Nathan, sorry you feel this way. We are proud of a lot of the content we create and aim for the highest possible accuracy. That said, it'd be lying if I claimed things don't slip through the cracks from time to time. If there was an article that you felt was particularly inaccurate, feel free to reach out to me and I'll look into it.
Too obsessed with their social score and woke agendas to give an honest review. Spammy and too into politics and propaganda.
Every article they write is just pathetic. It shouldn't even be considered news. Hope this site goes down soon enough. Full of useless idiot "writers". No one needs talentless frauds.
Let's start with the goods: Screenrant pays their writers. IGN is already losing here. Until you realize this is the only good this company does. Other than that, most of the articles are distasteful lies, they spoil shows and movies in their own titles which isn't good when it shows up in people's notifications, and and some articles just have horrible opinions/facts everyone already knows they use for clicks. Like, just today, and the inspiration for making this review, I found an article talking about how no one knows Goku's real name. They even put in parenthesis (& It's not Karkarot). You click on the article expecting to read something you've never known, like maybe Goku was mixed up with a kid named Kakarot on accident or something, but no. It's just the $#*! about Goku being based on and named after Sun Wukong which is something EVERY fan knows. And I can guarantee you they didn't even figure this out themselves. It probably only took them 20 seconds of research for an article that a lot of Dragon Ball fans will probably fall for and the person who wrote it will probably make some bank, which is actually the $#*!ing worst. I hate it so $#*!ing much.
I used to work for Screen Rant, so I have first hand experience witnessing their decline. From the standpoint of the reader, the site actually has solid news coverage, attracting exclusive interviews with big name celebs like The Rock. What ruins Screen Rant is that their news coverage isn't popular enough to sustain them, so in the last few years they turned to doing listicles to boost the clicks they get. And to their credit, the plan was successful. But the problem is, the listicles have now become the focus of the site, and the news has taken a backseat.
As someone who wrote for them, I can tell you that the editors don't care what the readers think. They advised us writers on numerous occasions to just not read the comments so we wouldn't have to see negative feedback. If you criticize them, the editors dismiss you as a baseless hater.
Screen Rant has continued to struggle even with their listicles, so they've slowly ramped up the workload for the writers, and delved into sleazier topics to get attention. It's not uncommon to now see articles about sexualized superheroes, celebrity drug scandals, and other tabloid quality writing. It doesn't even pay well anymore since they have repeatedly slashed the pay for writers. At this point, I'm glad I'm gone from there because the whole vibe behind the scenes is that Screen Rant is a sinking ship.
There are so many better news sites out there, so support them instead. Don't give your attention to Screen Rant now that they have devolved into shameless clickbait. They are unprofessional and not worth your time.
Puts spoilers in headlines for clicks. They literally spoil films and tv shows so they can make money. Please don't support websites like this.
Answer: Not at all easy, customer service and management are horrible at communication and responding to emails.
Answer: It's a legal site, When I want to read late-breaking movie news, I'll visit the trade sites like Variety or Hollywood Reporter. However, when I want something fun, I go to ScreenRant. A lot of people hate lists and fun articles, and that is fine, but I would prefer fun stuff to endless regurgitation of the same stories over and over. For people who hate fun, there is always Deadline. For people who love to read fun stuff about movies and TV, ScreenRant is well worth the follow.
The overall reputation of the company appears to be significantly tarnished, with numerous customers expressing frustration over the quality of content and excessive advertising. Common complaints highlight poorly written, repetitive articles that often lack originality and reliable sourcing, contributing to a perception of clickbait journalism. Additionally, users are dissatisfied with intrusive ads that disrupt the reading experience. While some acknowledge that the site may have once provided valuable insights, current sentiments overwhelmingly reflect disappointment and a call for improved editorial standards and user experience. Overall, there is a strong demand for enhanced content quality and transparency.
This summary is generated by AI, based on text from customer reviews
Hi Nicolay, I'm not sure what exactly your experience was - but we're not aiming to be a literary site. Our goal is to bridge the gap between hardcore film lovers and casual moviegoers. We write a lot of explainers, editorials, and news - but we've never positioned ourselves as literary.