The Guardian

Writers are infactualy in correct as I can spell they can't right. It's speaks for its self sput trash.

Whenever there was a large amount of opinion thru bias, it's called "propaganda" not Journalism.

The articles about the Drag protests is filled with complete bias and the question I wonder is, "WHY"

Why is it full of bias? Why can't the supposed news site stick to facts.

For example, instead of "EXTREMISTS INTERRUPT DRAG STORY" it say, "Concerned Parents interrupt" "People who disagree interrupt" etc... What's with the label?

How are these people extremists?

When Republicans are being interrupted by Trans, they call it they don't use the word "Extremist" or "Neo-Nazi" etc...

I'm apparently a Neo Nazi because I don't agree with kids being involved in heightened sexual awakening while they're still in kindergarten? That makes me an extremist?

I'm giving the Guardian a 1 star based on the lack of intellect that goes into writing these articles, the understanding of definitions they use for their writing, the lack of literacy, and the continuous bias and propaganda filled information which misleads people from seeing the stories clearly from the point of view of, "How it happened"

Most of these supposed Journalists have seemed to forgo their education in order to gain "Likes" for being dramatic verses being real and honest. Shame on this company as well as the others who play the same games.

It shouldn't be allowed to exist as a journalist column and should be considered Puff Magazine at this point. They're for inciting reactions instead of publishing the truth.

They haven't once written an article on the concerns psychologically of introducing children to sexual ideals of changing their body parts, living without identity, etc... And there is actual research done that could show case both sides equally.

I'm done reading the Guardian.

Horrible tried to destroy our children's. Full of pedos trash news pure bull$#*! the people talk we don't want you

Many years ago when the Guardian was the Manchester Guardian it was a progressive newspaper with integrity. These days the online Guardian has gone full bore with the current version of "political correctness." #MeToo; the penis is a lethal instrument; males--especially hetero males--are simply not to be trusted; the female body is surrounded by razor wire, and that is exactly as it should be. Every day the reader has to wade through 8 or 10 "articles," many of them both enraged and banal, which amounts to a reign of terror. Does the Guardian actually believe in this, or is it all to boost sales? It is hard to say, even as the Guardian is increasingly hard to stomach.

I used to read newspapers, and this time has now gone. I never read The Guardian in paper copy, but I found my way onto it online by being linked onto a couple of articles. They were quite original, and between times I've started to read certain pages regularly.
It's definitely a paper with political leanings, but is not particularly politically aggressive. It allows people to make up their own minds. However, it is for that very reason an annoying site. The reporting is far too politically correct, uncommitted, unresearched and unrepresentative. There are huge areas which seem to go under the radar, such as the environment, or business, or social issues or anything technical. Then you go onto a comments page, which is often the first page I open, and if you trawl through, you'll find some quite smart people, who maybe should be doing the reporting in the first place.
I have to back up my reading from more heavyweight journals. The Guardian is very lightweight, but it is a "news" website, and I haven't yet found a better alternative.