Reuters

A friend told me they only read current affairs from Reuters as they can be trusted to tell a story without choosing left or right, at first I believed it but now I'm seeing a lot of stuff that doesn't make it to Reuters or Reuters turning a long 2 sided story into a short one sided one (bias). Also it's extremely annoying when you scroll down and the headlines keep repeating like just in case you want to read the same $#*! again and again. Also if your looking for news out of south east Asia Reuters believes that's called china. Its not

Used to be an unbiased source of news. Someone has changed that. Money changes everything unfortunately. The work for the Democrats now, 100%. Sad that we can't just have a source of news that isn't polluted with propaganda. I'd like to make my own decision on what I believe please.

I mainly use Reuters UK, but find it constantly pushes a Pro-EU platform, even when the facts don't add up. Enjoys deleted posts in Facebook arguments that show facts against its articles whilst leaving others whether bullying or bs. Voices more opinion than news at stages.

Fraud in the 2020 election is real. All the news here says to stay home and vote by mail but I never received a ballot in the mail (I get other state gov. Mail just fine). There are cases all across the country and the media wants to say it's not true. These lies should not be on tv.

It just reports somebody else's opinion (not researches and facts) to argue against the statements of highly regarded scientists who reported facts about Covid tests that are supported by scientific evidence

Reuters "news" source's writers have sunk to a new low. Their assessment of the July 2020 US political climate is so far off base with its readership that they, themselves, have become what can only be termed propagandists. The time-honored profession of actual journalism is only a memory of past times when Edward R. Morrow types reported facts. That hardly applies anymore. In all honesty, Reuters seems far too partial to divisive ideologies to report accurate facts or tell the truth.

All day today Reuters has been pushing lies to soften the blow to the rich hedge funds at the cost of the little guy. I am absolutely disappointed and will never be able to believe anything this outlet says. We need market news we can trust, not lies to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Reuters claims that accuracy and fairness are the hallmarks of its reporting. But its reporting has come under increasing fire for its left-wing, anti-American bias. Read more here from an 'Accuracy in Media' analysis of Reuters http://www.aim.org/media-monitor/reuters-anti-american-bias/

Used to be a good source of unbiased factual news, Nowadays nothing but a left wing mouthpiece. Blatantly misleading headlines regarding the current president of the united states, Loves its "unnamed sources" as factual news, no longer a trustworthy news source nowadays pity really.

Used to be great. Now, just hard leftist bias and heavily authoritarian globalists. They used to be a good source of unbiased factual news, nowadays nothing but a leftwing mouthpiece. Blatantly misleading news.

I am just a grandmother that never voices her opinion, but after listening to their piece on the Republican National Convention I just had to say how biased the reporting was. So many comments inserted in their reporting. I am ashamed that Ameeican journalism has deteriorated so much. Just had to say something. Very sad.

Imgaine being such a failure that you work for a $#*! $#*! company like Reuters

They literally do nothing but stifle any and all things conservative and factual in an effort to push their own biased agendas and ideologies.

What a career path to choose... hope that 40k annually as well as the falsely induced sense of pride and accomplishment is worth being such a disgusting and worthless failure. Cucks.

Reuters is a very left leaning biased news source now. Reuters news used to be a reasonable news site but that has long passed. I read many sites each day to get a well rounded view of things and Reuters has gone down hill. The last two years has been the worst for a real honest article from them. They believe they are hiding how they feel but they are not fooling anyone with a half working brain. Sorry but they are just as bad as CNN now as truthfullness regarding any subject of POTUS or any GOP member. I don't like when FOX goes all biased and Reuters is worse then them and is at the same level as CNN as regards biased reporting.

Got to love when folks nails media sites because of their political views. Fox, right wing bias, MSNBC left wing bias. Reuters does not show any of that from what I have read. More I tend to rely more on the research and community report from NewsGuard, AllSides, and Media Bias/Face Check, than disgruntled folks that have become just a little more toxic in their political opinions.The only thing I could potential say is wrong with Reuters is that it is lacking flash - all the bells and whistles that so many other news sites shove in your fact. Hummm, actually that is a great plus.

I've noticed a Russian and right wing bias in their reporting over past six years. Their funding is non transparent. This has happened to a number of other trusted Western news platforms as well.

These reporters are no longer credible, and going into the future I will take all news coverage from these communist sympathizers with a large brick of salt.

"That the integrity, independence, and freedom from bias of Thomson Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved"

Reuters reporting has become heavily editorialized as of late, especially during the Trump era. It has swung heavily left lately with regards to immigration, China, and coverage of American politics.

Last year, Reuters didn't write a single article about a serial killer who killed upwards 20 white people. Billy Chemirmir. Why was that?

Why wasn't this considered newsworthy, but an argument in a dog park was national news for them? They have an agenda, and use gatekeeping to determine what people should see instead of what is actually newsworthy.

I'm a left leaning guy, but between Reuters and the ACLU I've lost faith in a lot of institutions that used to have integrity.

Wow! Honestly there's nothing negative one can say about Reuters, always giving the right infos and many trading and investing firms use Reuters updates on their site.

Clueless about the fraud mail in ballots evidence from Donald Trump, yet he's allowed to report the story on Pennsylvania, with a clear bias agenda, and misinformation.

Im tired of seeing you pin up china and degeade the president of the usa. $#*! china they are murdering lying loosers and the liberal media is right by thier side. Traitorous looseres deserve prison. China is the scum of the earth and nastiee then that. Destroy china...

REuters Spreading Fake news in ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA AND CAUSING UNREST AMONG PEOPLE. THEY REPORTED KIA CAR PLANT MOVING OUT TO DIFFERENT STATE WHICH IS NEWLY SETUP AND CREATED UNREST AMONG PEOPLE ABOUT LOOSING THEIR JOBS AND STATE LOSING THEIR INVESTEMENTS AND THEY HAVE A POLITICAL MOTIVE AND FAVOURED A POLITICAL PARTY

Reuter's ran a headline story last Friday (1/15) quoting Care ambulance services employee Eileen Cegarra, saying she was "overwhelmed" with calls, allegedly for "Covid." Having grown up in Los Angeles county area, where this ambulance service is located, I can assure you neither I nor anyone I know have ever heard of this company! And why would someone who thought they had "Covid" not go to their regular doctor, or an emergency room, or call 911 if they're having some kind of emergency symptoms -which seems extremely unlikely with a mild flu like symptoms of the alleged Covid, and the over 99% survival rate. So I called care ambulance services in Santa Fe Springs and spoke with Jennifer at the front desk. I asked her if they were truly overwhelmed with calls for people claiming they had Covid. "No". It was not true. She then got very nervous and would not put me through to speak with Eileen Cegarra. Reuter's journalists Norma Galeana and Alan Devall should be fired! This fear mongering story went out to all sorts of different news agencies and made front page headlines! And it is simply not true! And Reuters – where are the photos of the actual pandemic from your award-winning photo journalists? You have so many wonderful photographers and none have got photos to share from the middle of the "pandemic.?"

Aug 14 (Reuters) - Activist investor Elliott Investment Management has dissolved its stake in payments giant PayPal (PYPL.O), according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.